St. Cloud State University Survey

 

Annual Fall Statewide Survey

2008

 

LAST REVISED 10-24-08

 

 

 

MCj03352160000[1]

 

 

 

 


 

STEPHEN I. FRANK

PROFESSOR, AND CHAIRPERSON, DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE

CO-DIRECTOR, SCSU SURVEY

COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES

ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY

 

 

MICHELLE KUKOLECA HAMMES

ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE

CO-DIRECTOR, SCSU SURVEY

COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES

ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY

 

 

DAVID ROBINSON

PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS AND COMPUTER NETWORKING

CO-DIRECTOR, SCSU SURVEY

COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING

ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY

 

 

STEVEN C. WAGNER

PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE

CO-DIRECTOR, SCSU SURVEY

COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES

ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY

(ON LEAVE FROM SURVEY 2008-2009)

 

 

SANDRINE ZERBIB

ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY & ANTHROPOLOGY

CO-DIRECTOR, SCSU SURVEY

COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES

ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY

(ON LEAVE FROM SURVEY FALL 2008)

 

 LINK TO SUBSTANTIVE FINDINGS/

PRINT COPY OF CATI QUESTIONNAIRE

     LAST REVISED 10-24-08

 

October 2008

SCSU Survey- PRESS RELEASE

Summary of Most Results From the

Fall 2008 SCSU Statewide Survey

 

The SCSU Survey completed its annual fall statewide omnibus and has released most of the results which can be found   http:// web.stcloudstate.edu/scsusurvey

 

            NOTE: BEST TO USE INTERNET EXPLORER FOR VIEWING

.

 

500+ randomly chosen adult Minnesotans shared their views on a variety of pertinent topics, including:

 

-          The general direction the state and country are taking.

-          The biggest problem facing Minnesota and the U.S. and which political party, if any, can best handle the problem.

-          Job ratings for President Bush

-          Ratings on the SCSU Survey “Feeling Thermometer” (George Bush, John McCain, Barack Obama, Cindy McCain, Joe Biden, Sarah Palin, Amy Klobuchar, Tim Pawlenty, Norm Coleman, Al Franken, Dean Barkley, Michelle Obama, and Hillary Rodham Clinton).

-          US President and Senate trial heat questions.

-          Trial heat question follow-up questions on why they are voting for the candidate they selected.

 

Breakdowns by party, ideology, area of the state, gender, age, religion, household income, education, employment status and other variables can be made available.

 

A major difference in this year’s survey is the use of both landline and cell phone numbers using separate random digit dialing procedures. Also, in the trial heat questions candidate’s names were rotated. Major efforts were made to reach hard to get respondents by calling up to 10 times over seven days of calling. The demographics of the sample are a very close match to the demographics of the state although some weighting was done, especially to the cell phone sample which was a much younger set of respondents.

 

509 respondents  Overall Sample Error after weighting 4.6%.

 

TOP LINE RESULTS

 

Over 8 of 10 Minnesota adults think the country is headed on the wrong track. 4 of 10 think the state is headed on the wrong track.

 

Financial/economic factors are cited as the biggest problem facing the country. Democrats are seen as the party best able to handle problems especially the financial crisis.

 

Five issues are almost evenly tied as the biggest problem facing the state led by education with 12%. Democrats are given a slight edge as problem solvers and on specific issues such as education, financial crisis and health care. Republicans are seen as better able to deal with taxes (caution small n’s).

 

Barack Obama has a slight edge (5%) over John McCain while Al Franken trails Norm Coleman by about 8%. Compared to other surveys these results are lower for Obama and Franken compared to what some have found.  There is little difference between all adult Minnesotans, registered voter Minnesotans, and likely voter MN. (voted in 2006 or good reason such as age not to, registered or plan to register, very or somewhat likely to vote).

 

REASONS FOR VOTING AND BREAKOUTS ARE IN ATTACHMENT OR CONTACT A FACULTY DIRECTOR

 

 

 

 

 

Adapting the University of Michigan’s “feeling thermometer” as a measure of warmth-likeability the order of warmth are (the mean excluded respondents who said they didn’t know the person, couldn’t judge or the less than 1% who refused to rate). Ratings above 50 are considered warm and favorable. Below 50 are cool and unfavorable.

 

NAME

MEAN

NUMBER WHO RATED

OBAMA

54

481

PAWLENTY

53

456

KLOBUCHAR

53

426

HR CLINTON

53

486

MICHELLE OBAMA

51

430

JOE BIDEN

51

428

JOHN MCCAIN

50

492

DEAN BARKLEY

49

286

CINDY MCCAIN

47

395

NORM COLEMAN

46

487

SARA PALIN

42

475

AL FRANKEN

38

463

GEORGE BUSH

33

492

 

 

Breakdowns are available for variables such as gender. For example both men and women rate Governor Palin about the same.

 

6 of 10 Minnesotans disapprove of our current policy toward Iraq.

 

Only 17% rate President Bush’s job performance as positive.

 

SOME PAST RESULTS  -

THE SCSU SURVEY IS DONE AT LEAST A  WEEK OR SO BEFORE THE ELECTION.

 

 

 

2000

 

2004

 

2006

 

 

scsu survey

Actual

Scsu

Actual

survey

actual

BUSH

38/41

45

BUSH        42

47

KLOB        46

58

GORE

39/38

48

KERRY     49

51

KENNEDY 30

38

 

 

 

 

 

   16% difference

20% difference

DAYTON

47/48

48

 

 

 

 

GRAMS

43

44

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Presidential Election- All Respondents

 

Thanks. Our next series of questions relate to next month's Presidential election.

 

If the November 2008 election for President of the United States were being held today, would you vote for John McCain, Barack Obama, Ralph Nader, Robert Barr, or another candidate?

[IF NOT SURE]

Although you are not sure, would you say you lean more toward Obama, McCain, Barr, Nader, or another candidate?

Response

Frequency

All

Respondents

Percent

All

Respondents

McCain

182

37

Obama

208

42

Barr

16

3

Nader

0

0

Other Candidate

17

4

Won’t Vote

10

2

Don’t Know

59

12

Total

492

100

\\

 

 


 

 Senate Election- All Respondents

 

Our next series of questions relate to next month's Senate election.

If the November 2008 election for Senate were being held today, would you vote for Al Franken, Dean Barkley, Norm Coleman, or a candidate of another party?

[IF NOT SURE]

Although you are not sure, would you say you lean more toward Coleman, Barkley, Franken, or a candidate or another party?

 

Response

Frequency

All Respondents

Percent

All Respondents

Coleman

176

36

Franken

132

27

Barkley

79

16

Other Candidate

12

2

Won’t Vote

14

3

Don’t Know

82

16

Total

495

100

 

 

 

OTHER POLLS

RCP Average

10/15 - 10/22

--

--

52.8

40.5

Obama +12.3

Rasmussen

10/22 - 10/22

500 LV

4.5

56

41

Obama +15

Big10 Battleground

10/19 - 10/22

583 LV

4.2

57

38

Obama +19

National Journal/FD

10/16 - 10/20

402 RV

4.9

50

40

Obama +10

SurveyUSA

10/16 - 10/18

655 LV

3.9

50

44

Obama +6

Star Tribune

10/16 - 10/17

1049 LV

3.8

52

41

Obama +11

Research 2000

10/15 - 10/16

600 LV

4.0

52

39

Obama +13

 

 

 

Date

Sample

Franken (D)

Coleman (R)

Barkley (I)

Spread

RCP Average

10/15 - 10/22

--

40.0

37.4

17.2

Franken +2.6

Rasmussen

10/22 - 10/22

500 LV

41

37

17

Franken +4

Big10 Battleground

10/19 - 10/22

583 RV

40

34

15

Franken +6

Star Tribune

10/16 - 10/17

1049 LV

39

36

18

Franken +3

SurveyUSA

10/16 - 10/18

655 LV

39

41

18

Coleman +2

Research 2000

10/15 - 10/16

600 LV

41

39

18

Franken +2

See All Minnesota Senate Polling Data

 

 

 

 

=========================================================

 

Other questions such as spending patterns of Minnesotans in light of recent financial downturns will be released later.

 

 

The questions, analysis and reports are the product of the undergraduate/graduate students and faculty who work with the SCSU Survey. 

 

Questions may be directed to the faculty directors of the Survey:

Steve Frank, sfrank@stcloudstate.edu, 320-308-4131

Michelle Kukoleca Hammes, mhammes@stcloudstate.edu, 320-308-4130

David Robinson dhrobinson@stcloudstate.edu 320-308-2149

(Professors Wagner and Zerbib are on leave.)

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

I.                  Introduction to the Report and Methods

 

The SCSU Survey is an ongoing survey research extension of the Social Science Research Institute in the College of Social Sciences at St. Cloud State University. The SCSU Survey performs its research in the form of telephone interviews. 

 

Dr. Stephen Frank began the survey in 1980 conducting several omnibus surveys a year of central Minnesota adults in conjunction with his Political Science classes.  Presently, the omnibus surveys continue, but have shifted to a primary statewide focus.  These statewide surveys are conducted once a year in the fall and focus on statewide issues such as election races, current events, and other important issues that are present in the state of Minnesota. 

 

The primary mission of the SCSU Survey is to serve the academic community and public and nonprofit sector community through its commitment to high quality survey research and to provide education and experiential opportunities to researchers and students.  We strive to assure that all SCSU students and faculty directors contribute to the research process, as all are essential in making a research project successful.  This success is measured by our ability to obtain high quality survey data that is timely, accurate, and reliable, while maintaining an environment that promotes the professional and personal growth of each staff member.  The survey procedures used by the SCSU Survey adhere to the highest quality academic standards.  The SCSU Survey maintains the highest ethical standards in its procedures and methods.  Both faculty and student directors demonstrate integrity and respect for dignity in all interactions with colleagues, clients, researchers, and survey participants.

 

II.               Survey Personnel

 

The Survey’s faculty directors are Dr. Steve Frank (SCSU Professor of Political Science), Dr. Steven Wagner (SCSU Professor of Political Science),Dr. David Robinson (SCSU Professor of Statistics and Computer Networking). Dr. Michelle Kukoleca Hammes (SCSU Associate Professor of Political Science and Dr. Sandrine Zerbib (SCSU Assistant Professor of Sociology). The faculty directors are members of the Midwest Association of Public Opinion Research (M.A.P.O.R.) and the American Association of Public Opinion Research (A.A.P.O.R.). The directors subscribe to the code of ethics of A.A.P.O.R.

           

a. Stephen I. Frank

 

Dr. Frank holds a Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science from Washington State University.  Dr. Frank teaches courses in American Politics, Public Opinion and Research Methods at St. Cloud State University.  Dr. Frank started the SCSU Survey in 1980, and since has played a major role in the development, administration and analysis of over 150 telephone surveys for local and state governments, school districts and a variety of nonprofit agencies.  Dr. Frank has completed extensive postgraduate work in survey research at the University of Michigan.  Dr. Frank coauthored with Dr. Wagner and published by Harcourt College, “We Shocked the World!”  A Case Study of Jesse Ventura’s Election as Governor of Minnesota. Revised Edition.  He also recently published two academic book chapters: one appears in the current edition of Perspectives on Minnesota Government and Politics and the other, co-authored with Dr. Wagner, is contained in Campaigns and Elections, edited by Robert Watson and Colton Campbell.  Dr. Frank is past chairperson of the SCSU Department of Political Science and recently served as President of the Minnesota Political Science Association.

 

 

b. Steven C. Wagner (On Leave From The Survey 2008-2009 Academic Year)

 

Dr. Wagner holds a Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science and a Master of Public Administration from Northern Illinois University.  Dr. Wagner earned his Bachelor of Science in Political Science from Illinois State University.  Dr. Wagner teaches courses in American Politics and Public and Nonprofit Management at St. Cloud State University.  Dr. Wagner joined the SCSU Survey in 1997.  Before coming to SCSU, Dr. Wagner taught in Kansas where he engaged in community-based survey research and before that was staff researcher for the U.S. General Accounting Office.  Dr. Wagner has written many papers on taxation, and state politics and has published articles on voting behavior, federal funding of local services and organizational decision making.  Dr. Wagner, with Dr. Frank, recently published two texts on Jesse Ventura’s election as Minnesota’s Governor and a book chapter on the campaign. Dr. Wagner currently serves the SCSU Department of Political Science as its chairperson.

 

C. Michelle Kukoleca Hammes 

 

Dr. Kukoleca Hammes holds a Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science and a Masters in Political Science from the State University of New York at Binghamton.  Dr. Kukoleca Hammes earned her Bachelor of Arts in Political Science from Niagara University.  Kr. Kukoleca Hammes’ is a comparativist with an area focus on North America and Western Europe.  Her substantive focus is representative governmental institutions.  She teaches courses in American Government, Introduction to Ideas and Institutions, Western European Politics, and a Capstone in Political Science at St. Cloud State University.  Dr. Kukoleca Hammes, since joining the survey team, is using her extensive graduate school training in political methodology to aid in questionnaire construction and results analysis.  She recently published a book chapter on Minnesota public participation in the Fifth Edition of Perspectives on Minnesota Government and Politics.

 

D. David H. Robinson

 

Dr. Robinson holds a Doctor of Philosophy in Statistics and a Masters in Statistics from the University of Iowa.  Dr. Robinson earned his Bachelor of Science in Mathematics from Henderson State University.  At St. Cloud State University, Dr. Robinson teaches courses in survey planning and contingency tables, statistical methods for the social sciences, probability and computer simulation, and other statistical applications.  Since coming to SCSU in 1985 and before that time, Dr. Robinson has served as statistical consultant for numerous statistical analyses of survey results.  He has coauthored a book on computer simulation and analysis, and has published articles in the areas of nonparametric statistics, multivariate statistics, analysis of baseball statistics, and statistical analysis of computer network performance.  Dr. Robinson recently served as chairperson for the SCSU Department of Statistics and Computer Networking.

 

 

E. Sandrine Zerbib (On Leave From The Survey Fall 2008)

 

Dr. Zerbib holds a Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology from the University of California Irvine and a Masters in Sociology from both California State University-Fullerton and University of Paris 10-Nanterre (France). Dr. Zerbib’s ongoing research focuses on issues of immigration, sexuality and citizenship.  Dr. Zerbib’s current research analyzes the effect of domestic partnership laws on gay bi-national couples leaving in France.  She is currently collaborating with Dr. Downey on belly dance performance and gender politics. She teaches courses in Research Methods, Sociology of Gender, Immigration and Citizenship, and Advanced Research Methods

 

 

                                                                               

III.           Call Center Supervisors and Interviewers

 

Without the assistance of survey student directors, this project would not have been completed.  They are:

 

LEAD DIRECTOR

 

Ms. Renee Helm, 4th Year Student, Public Administration Major with Mathematics Minor, St. Joseph, Minnesota

 

 

Survey Lab Student Directors

 

Ms. Heidi Nelson, 4th year student, Political Science and History Majors, New Hope, MN

 

Ms. Hadiza Galadima 4th Year Student, Statistics with emphasis in Actuarial Science and minor in Mathematics. , St Cloud, MN.

 

Mr. Trevor Lynch, 3rd year Student, Political Science Major, History and International Relations Minor, Maplewood, Minnesota

 

Mr. Tyler Rittmaster, 3rd year Marketing Major, Bloomington, MN (studying abroad spring semester 2008)

 

Mr. Craig Barthel, 3rd year student, Political Science major with Public Administration minor, Albertville, Minnesota

 

Mr. Birat Krishna Thapa, 1st Year Student, Political Science Major with International Relations Minor, Saint Cloud MN

 

Mr. Derrek Lee Helmin, 3rd Year Student, Political Science and Economics Major, Saint Cloud, MN

 

Ms. Diane Fournier, Graduate Student Master of Science degree, specializing in Mathematics and Statistics Education (fall semester only)

 

 

 

Student technical consultant

 

Mr. Justin Rassier, 4th  Year Student, Computer Science Major, St. Joseph , Minnesota

 

 

Student Callers

 

After five or more hours of training and screening, approximately 25 students from Political Science 195 classes (Introductory American National Government) and taught by Drs. Frank and Kukoleca Hammes completed the calling.  The survey also employed several highly trained paid callers who mainly focused on refusal conversion calls.  Faculty directors monitored the calling shifts.  Student directors conducted both general training sessions and one-on-one training sessions as well as monitoring all calling shifts.


IV.             Methodology

 

Introduction

The October 2008 St. Cloud State University Survey findings are based on telephone interviews with a representative sample of 509 adults in Minnesota. The sample included both landline phones and cell phones. Interviews were conducted from October 14 to October 22, 2008 at St. Cloud State University Survey Lab. The sample was obtained from Survey Sampling International (SSI) of Fairfield, Connecticut.  

 

Sample Design

The sample was designed to represent all adults (age 18 and older) with a landline or cell phone in Minnesota.

Landline Phones: The landline telephone numbers were drawn using standard list-assisted random digit dialing (RDD) methodology. Random digit dialing guarantees coverage of every assigned phone number regardless of whether numbers are directory listed, purposely unlisted, or too new to be listed. The numbers were generated from active blocks, proportionally to the number of landline telephone households by county.

 

Using the RDD database of active 100-blocks of telephone numbers (area code + exchange + two-digit block number) that contain three or more residential directory listings, selections were made in proportion to the block count of listed telephone households. After selection two more random digits were added to complete the number. Completed numbers were then compared against business directories, and listed business numbers were purged.

 

Cell Phones:   The cell phone numbers were drawn from the most recent Telcordia TPM master file of NPA-NXX and Block-ID records for the North American Number Plan. All records from NPA-NXX and 1000 blocks that indicated a cell phone service, were included in the wireless sampling frame. New exchanges were included, as were shared blocks.

 

Each exchange and 1000-block in the frame was expanded down to the 100-block level. Shared 100-blocks were then compared to the RDD database, so that the 100-blocks with no listed numbers were left in the wireless sample, while the 100-blocks containing listed numbers on the RDD frame were removed from the wireless sample. This resulted in a wireless frame of 100-blocks that had no overlap with the list-assisted RDD sample described above. Two more random digits were then added to complete the number.

 

Contact Procedures

Before calling began, the original sample was comprised of 3,740 landline and 1,200 cell phone numbers. After completing the survey, the total weighted sample consisted was 509 respondents. Of these, 379 were on landline phones and 130 were on cell phones.

 

The sample was released for calling in replicates, which are representative subsamples of the larger sample (200 phone numbers). Using replicates to control the release of sample ensures that complete call procedures are followed for the entire sample.

 

Several steps were taken to ensure that the telephone sample of adults in the state was representative of the larger adult state population. Interviewers for landline numbers alternately asked to speak with men and women, and oldest and youngest person (age at least 18 years old) at the households that were called. This systematic respondent selection technique has been shown to produce samples that closely mirror the population in terms of age and gender. For cell phone numbers, the interview was completed with the person of initial contact, provided the contact person was at least 18 years of age and a Minnesota resident.

 

Phone numbers with no initial contact were called up to 10 times over different days and times to increase the possibility of contact. In addition, appointments were made as necessary to interview the designated respondent at his/her convenience. Calling was completed between 4:30 pm to 9:30 pm to maximize contacts and ensure equal opportunities to respond among various respondent demographic groups. Attempts to convert initial refusals commenced almost immediately and continued throughout the survey. The final few nights of interviewing were almost exclusively devoted to contacting hard to reach respondents who often are younger and more affluent.

 

Technology

The SCSU Survey operates a Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI) Lab on the St. Cloud State University campus. The CATI Lab is equipped with 19 interviewer stations; each includes a computer, a phone, and a headset. In addition to the interviewer stations, there is the Supervisor Station, which is used to monitor the survey while it is in progress. The SCSU Survey has its own server designated solely for the use of the SCSU Survey.

 

The SCSU Survey is licensed to use Sawtooth Software’s Ci3 Questionnaire Authoring Version 4.1, a state-of-the-art windows-based computer-assisted interviewing package. This program allows us to develop virtually any type of questionnaire while at the same time programming edit and consistency checks and other quality control measures to ensure the most valid data. The instrument was pre-tested prior to interviewing to make certain that all equipment and programming was in working order and to verify that the questionnaire was clear.

 

All interview stations are networked for complete, ongoing sample management.  Sawtooth Software’s Ci3 allows immediate data updating, ensuring maximum data integrity and allowing clients to get progress reports anytime. The Survey directors are able the review data for quality and consistency. Question answers are entered directly into the computer, thus keypunching is eliminated, which decreases human error and facilitates immediate data analysis. The calling system is programmed to store call record keeping automatically, allowing interviewers and supervisors to focus on the interviewing task. Callbacks are programmed through the computer network and made on a schedule.

 

Sample Error

The margin of sampling error for the complete set of weighted data is ±4.6 percent at the 95 percent confidence level. In all sample surveys there are other possible sources of error for which precise estimates cannot be calculated. These include interviewer and coder error, respondent misinterpretation, and analysis errors. When analysis is made of sub-samples such as respondent gender, the sample error may be larger.

 

Sample Weighting

Weighting is generally used in survey analysis to compensate for patterns of nonresponse that might bias results. The interviewed sample of all adults was weighted to match parameters for ownership of the two types of phones, as well as gender and age. The phone ownership parameters were determined from the 2007 National Health Interview Survey, while the age and gender parameters came from a special analysis of the Census 2000 Summary File 4 (SF 4). All statistics reported are weighted.

 

Weighting was accomplished using statistical raking, a special iterative sample weighting technique that simultaneously balances the distributions of all variables. The use of these weights in statistical analysis ensures that the demographic characteristics of the sample closely approximate the demographic characteristics of the Minnesota population.

 

The complete questionnaire and results can be found on the Survey web page http://web.stcloudstate.edu/scsusurvey.

 

Sample Disposition

4932

Total Numbers Dialed

 

 

313

   Business / Government

133

   Computer/Fax

1208

   Other Not-Working

3278

Working numbers

66.5%

Working Rate

 

 

763

   No Answer

228

   Busy

690

   Answering Machine

227

   Other Non-Contacts

1370

Contacted numbers

41.8%

Contact Rate

 

 

477

   Callbacks

893

Cooperating numbers

65.2%

Cooperation Rate

 

 

72

   Language/Hearing Barrier

112

   Screenouts

709

Eligible numbers

79.4%

Eligibility Rate

 

 

200

   Refusal after case determined eligible

509

   Completes

71.8%

Completion Rate

 

 

19.6%

Response Rate