FALL 2002 General Political Questions
[LAST REVISED 10/31/02]
BEST IF VIEWED WITH INTERNET EXPLORER
This
section of the report contains several questions of a general political
nature. It is common practice for us to
annually ask these questions. The questions
include a general question on the direction of state, main problem Minnesotans
see facing the state and which political party may be in the best position to
fix that problem. We have also included
our annual “Feeling Thermometer” in this section of the report.
In addition to display of data from this year’s survey, we have include relevant from our statewide surveys conducted in November 2001 and October 2000. The sample parameters of the 2001 and 2000 survey are roughly the same as the 2002 survey. Survey Sampling, Inc. constructed the sample of Minnesota adults. The sample was constructed using the random digit dialing method. In 2001, the sample size was 611, with a margin of error of 3.9. In 2000, the sample size was 629, with a margin of error of 3.9 percent. The cooperation rate for the 2001 survey was 56% while cooperation rate for the 2000 survey was 58 percent. The demographics of the 2001 and 2000 surveys matched the state and, therefore, we assert the data between the three surveys is comparable.
More extended time series reports from previous SCSU Survey research findings regarding many of these general political questions are available on the SCSU Survey web page. Please enter http://web.stcloudstate.edu/scussurvey and follow the links.
|
Table 2: Direction of the State |
||||||
|
“Do you think things in the State of Minnesota are generally going in the right direction, or do you feel things have gotten off on the wrong track?” |
||||||
|
|
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
|||
|
RESPONSE |
FREQUENCY |
PERCENT |
FREQUENCY |
PERCENT |
FREQUENCY |
PERCENT |
|
Right
Direction |
436 |
70 |
344 |
56 |
232 |
38 |
|
Neutral |
61 |
10 |
66 |
11 |
83 |
14 |
|
Wrong
Track |
102 |
16 |
165 |
27 |
260 |
42 |
|
Don’t
Know |
27 |
4 |
35 |
6 |
35 |
6 |
|
Total |
626 |
100% |
610 |
100% |
610 |
100% |
Figure 1: Direction of the State


Table
3: Problems Facing the State of Minnesota |
||||||
|
“What
do you think is the single most important problem facing the State of
Minnesota today?” |
||||||
|
|
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
|||
|
RESPONSE |
FREQ. |
PERCENT |
FREQ. |
PERCENT |
FREQ. |
PERCENT |
|
Abortion |
9 |
1 |
8 |
1 |
8 |
1 |
|
Agriculture-General |
4 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
|
Corporate
Leaders/ Stocks-Bonds |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
3 |
0 |
|
Budget/Surplus |
6 |
1 |
16 |
2 |
77 |
14 |
|
Chemical/Bio. Hazard |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Crime/Gangs/Violence |
41 |
7 |
9 |
1 |
9 |
2 |
|
Drug
Use |
17 |
3 |
4 |
0 |
11 |
2 |
|
Economic
Issues/ Jobs/Wages |
12 |
2 |
45 |
7 |
79 |
13 |
|
Education |
128 |
21 |
150 |
25 |
142 |
23 |
|
Environmental
Issues |
16 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
12 |
2 |
|
Family
Issues |
2 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
Gambling |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Greed/selfishness |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
4 |
0 |
|
Health
Issues/ Insurance- |
41 |
7 |
14 |
2 |
17 |
3 |
|
Immigration |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
4 |
0 |
|
Moral/Religious
Issues |
13 |
2 |
44 |
7 |
3 |
0 |
|
Politics/Politicians |
10 |
2 |
9 |
1 |
26 |
4 |
|
Poverty/
Poor/ Housing |
5 |
1 |
6 |
1 |
9 |
2 |
|
Roads/Highways
|
19 |
3 |
18 |
3 |
37 |
7 |
|
Utility
Prices, Gas,
Energy |
2 |
0 |
14 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
|
Senior
Issues/ Elderly |
5 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
8 |
1 |
|
Sports-General |
N/A |
N/A |
12 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
|
Jesse Ventura |
9 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
3 |
|
Taxes |
112 |
18 |
69 |
11 |
58 |
10 |
|
Terrorism |
N/A |
N/A |
1 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
|
Twins
Going |
N/A |
N/A |
17 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
|
Welfare
Issues, Waste,
Fraud |
14 |
2 |
76 |
12 |
17 |
3 |
|
Prescription
Drugs |
4 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
1 |
|
Other/Multiple |
74 |
12 |
6 |
1 |
14 |
2 |
|
Don’t
Know |
65 |
10 |
7 |
1 |
40 |
7 |
|
Total |
625 |
100% |
611 |
100% |
613 |
100% |
Figure 2: Top 10 Problems
Affecting State


|
Table 4: Which Party Can Better Fix
Problems |
||||||
|
“Which political party, if any, do you think can do a better job of handling the problem you have just mentioned- the Republican Party, the Democratic Party, the Independence Party, or the Reform Party?” |
||||||
|
|
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
|||
|
RESPONSE |
FREQ. |
PERCENT |
FREQ. |
PERCENT |
FREQ. |
PERCENT |
|
Republican |
174 |
27 |
154 |
30 |
166 |
27 |
|
Democratic |
152 |
28 |
165 |
32 |
157 |
26 |
|
Reform
(2000/1) Green
(2002) |
19 |
4 |
15 |
3 |
16 |
3 |
|
Independence
Party |
63 |
12 |
41 |
8 |
58 |
10 |
|
Other
- Volunteered |
11 |
2 |
12 |
2 |
7 |
1 |
|
Same
– Volunteered |
N/A |
N/A |
6 |
1 |
7 |
1 |
|
Neither |
58 |
11 |
46 |
9 |
73 |
12 |
|
Don’t
Know |
89 |
16 |
79 |
15 |
118 |
20 |
|
Total |
539 |
100% |
518 |
100% |
602 |
100% |
Figure 3: Which Party Can Better
Fix Problems


|
Table 5: Overall Rating of Jesse Ventura as
Governor
|
||||||
|
“How would you rate the overall performance of Jesse Ventura as
Governor; excellent, pretty good, only fair or poor?” |
||||||
|
|
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
|||
|
RESPONSE |
FREQ. |
PERCENT |
FREQ. |
PERCENT |
FREQ. |
PERCENT |
|
Excellent |
77 |
12 |
68 |
11 |
50 |
8 |
|
Pretty
Good |
318 |
51 |
200 |
33 |
189 |
31 |
|
Only
Fair |
175 |
28 |
206 |
34 |
219 |
36 |
|
Poor |
51 |
8 |
127 |
21 |
145 |
24 |
|
Don’t
Know |
6 |
1 |
9 |
1 |
7 |
1 |
|
Total |
627 |
100% |
610 |
100% |
610 |
100% |


|
Table 6: Feeling Thermometer |
||||
|
“Please think of a thermometer that has a range of 0 to 100 degrees. I’d like you to rate your feelings toward some of our political leaders and other people who are in the news. Ratings on the thermometer between 50 and 100 degrees mean that you feel favorable and warm toward the person. Ratings between 0 and 50 mean that you do not feel too favorable toward the person. If we come to a person whose name you don’t recognize, you don’t need to rate that person. Just tell me and we will move on to the next one. If you do recognize the name, but do not feel particularly warm or cold toward the person, you would rate that person at the 50 degree mark.” (Interviewers
do not tell the respondent who the person is or any information about the
person.) |
||||
|
Person |
Mean
Response 2001 |
Freq./Pct.
Don’t
Know/ Can’t Judge 2001 |
Mean
Response 2002 |
Freq./Pct.
Don’t
Know/ Can’t Judge 2002 |
|
George
W. Bush |
70 |
9-1% |
60 |
7-2% |
|
Mike
Hatch |
NA |
NA |
56 |
246-41% |
|
Roger
Moe |
NA |
NA |
47 |
153-26% |
|
Paul
Wellstone |
52 |
37-6% |
47 |
24-13% |
|
Tim
Penny |
NA |
NA |
51 |
161-27% |
|
Tim
Pawlenty |
54 |
350-58% |
50 |
178-30% |
|
Ken
Pentel |
NA |
NA |
43 |
403-67% |
|
Jesse Ventura |
49 |
6-1% |
47 |
7-2% |
|
Norm Coleman |
58 |
62-10% |
53 |
30-6% |
|
Jim
Moore |
NA |
NA |
45 |
485-80% |
|
Mark
Dayton |
56 |
60-10% |
50 |
105-19% |
|
Torii Hunter |
NA |
NA |
70 |
291-49% |
|
Randy Moss |
NA |
NA |
30 |
63-10% |
|
Martha Stewart |
NA |
NA |
31 |
50-10% |
|
Kenneth
Lay |
NA |
NA |
21 |
361-60% |
|
Ray
Tricomo |
NA |
NA |
43 |
509-84% |
|
As
noted earlier, we did not ask about Senator Wellstone on Sunday, October 27,
thus the sample size for his score this year is 51 less than for the other
individuals. |
||||
In the
2000 statewide survey, we also asked about Senator Wellstone, who received a
mean score of 51, Governor Ventura who received a 60, Mayor Coleman who
received a 55, Presidential Candidate George W. Bush who received a 52 and
Senate candidate Mark Dayton, who received a mean score of 52.
Questions
displayed in tables 7, 8, and 9 are used to construct a profile of a “likely
voter”. We defined a likely voter as
someone who is or will probably register to vote, voted in the 2000
presidential election or had a good reason to not vote and either are certain
or are probably going to vote in the November 2002 statewide elections.


|
Table 7: Registered to Vote |
||
|
“Are you presently registered to vote or do you plan to register to vote in the area in which you are now living?” |
||
|
RESPONSE |
FREQUENCY |
PERCENT |
|
Yes-Is
registered or plan to register |
578 |
94 |
|
No |
31 |
5 |
|
Don’t
Know |
4 |
1 |
|
Total |
613 |
100% |
|
Table 8: Vote in 2000 Presidential
Election |
||
|
“Did you get a chance to vote in the 2000 election for President between George W. Bush, Al Gore and Ralph Nadar?” |
||
|
RESPONSE |
FREQUENCY |
PERCENT |
|
Yes |
522 |
85 |
|
No-But
had good reason |
33 |
5 |
|
No |
55 |
9 |
|
Don’t
Know |
3 |
1 |
|
Total |
613 |
100% |
|
Table 9: Chances of Voting this November |
||
|
“What are the chances of your voting in next month’s election? Are you certain to vote, will you probably vote, are you not sure yet or don’t you think you will vote?” |
||
|
RESPONSE |
FREQUENCY |
PERCENT |
|
Certain |
483 |
78 |
|
Probably
vote |
61 |
10 |
|
Not
sure yet |
28 |
5 |
|
Won’t
vote |
37 |
6 |
|
Don’t
Know |
4 |
1 |
|
Total |
613 |
100% |
|
Table 10: Politics Since 9-11 |
||
|
“Since the September 11th attacks, do you feel more
inclined, less inclined, or has 9-11 not changed your inclination to
participate in governmental elections?” |
||
|
RESPONSE |
FREQUENCY |
PERCENT |
|
More
Inclined |
130 |
21 |
|
Less
Inclined |
7 |
1 |
|
No
Change Anticipated |
469 |
77 |
|
Don’t
Know |
6 |
1 |
|
Total |
612 |
100% |
Figure 5: Politics Since 9-11

|
Table 11: Party Identification |
||
|
“Do you usually consider yourself to be a Democrat, Republican, Reform
Party member, Minnesota Independence Party member, a member of another party,
or are you an independent who is not a member of any party?” (If
Democrat or Republican or Reform of Independence) “Would you say that you always vote Dmocrat/Republican/Reform/Indepence or do you someties vote for a person of another party?” (If
Independent) “Although you are an independent, do you usually consider yourself to be closer to the Democrats, Republicans, the Reform Party of the Independence Party?” |
||
|
RESPONSE |
FREQUENCY |
PERCENT |
|
Always
Votes Democratic |
69 |
11 |
|
Democrat
Who Sometimes Votes for Another Party |
92 |
15 |
|
Always
Votes Republican |
82 |
13 |
|
Republican
Who Sometimes Votes for Another Party |
64 |
10 |
|
Always
Votes Green |
2 |
0 |
|
Green
Party Member Who Sometimes Votes for Another Party |
4 |
1 |
|
Always
Votes Independence |
11 |
2 |
|
Independence
Party Member Who Sometimes Votes for Another Party |
27 |
4 |
|
Independent
Closer to Democrats |
67 |
11 |
|
Independent
Closer to Republicans |
46 |
8 |
|
Independent
Closer to Reform Party (2001) Green (2002) |
7 |
1 |
|
Independent
Closer to Independence Party |
33 |
6 |
|
Other |
31 |
6 |
|
Apolitical |
31 |
6 |
|
Don’t
Know |
38 |
6 |
|
Total |
604 |
100% |
In
2001, the SCSU Survey found that DFL always, sometimes and independent but
closer to DFL identifier was 43%, Republican 33% and Independence 11%.
Figure 6: Party Identification[1]

v. 2002
Election “Horse-Race” Questions
|
Table 12: Control of Minnesota Legislature |
||||
|
“Looking ahead to next November’s election in which all members of the
Minnesota legislature will be elected, right now the Republicans control the
Minnesota House while the Democrats control the Minnesota Senate. Which of the following would you like to see happen- keep control the
way it is now, the Republicans gain control of both Houses, the Democrats
gain control of both Houses, another party such as the Reform Party of
Independence Party gain control, or haven’t you thought much about this
issue?” |
||||
|
|
2001 |
2002 |
||
|
RESPONSE |
FREQUENCY |
PERCENT |
FREQUENCY |
PERCENT |
|
Keep
Divided Control |
152 |
25 |
110 |
18 |
|
Republican
Control |
111 |
18 |
139 |
23 |
|
Democratic
Control |
116 |
19 |
122 |
20 |
|
Another
Party Controls |
22 |
4 |
59 |
10 |
|
Haven’t
Thought Much About |
160 |
26 |
123 |
20 |
|
Other-
Volunteered |
11 |
3 |
10 |
2 |
|
Don’t
Know |
31 |
5 |
43 |
7 |
|
Total |
603 |
100% |
606 |
100% |
Figure 7: Control of Minnesota
Legislature

|
Table 13: 2002 Minnesota Governor’s
Election All Respondents and Likely Voter |
||||
|
“If the election for Minnesota Governor’s race were being held today, would you vote for Roger Moe, the Democrat candidate, Tim Penny, the Independence Party candidate, Tim Pawlenty, the Republican candidate, or Ken Pentel, the Green Party candidate or a candidate of another party? (If
the respondent is not sure) “Although you are not sure, would you say you are leaning more toward Moe, Penny, Pawlenty, or Pentel or a candidate of another party?” |
||||
|
|
All Respondents
|
Likely Voters
|
||
|
RESPONSE |
FREQ. |
PERCENT |
FREQ. |
PERCENT |
|
Definitely
Moe |
115 |
19 |
105 |
20 |
|
Leaning
Moe |
36 |
6 |
33 |
7 |
|
Definitely
Penny |
96 |
16 |
85 |
17 |
|
Leaning
Penny |
54 |
9 |
44 |
9 |
|
Definitely
Pawlenty |
127 |
21 |
114 |
22 |
|
Leaning
Pawlenty |
44 |
8 |
41 |
8 |
|
Definitely
Pentel |
9 |
2 |
7 |
1 |
|
Leaning
Pentel |
6 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
|
Other |
10 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
|
Don’t
Know |
91 |
16 |
68 |
14 |
|
Total |
588 |
100% |
505 |
100% |
Figure 8: 2002 Minnesota Governor’s Election
|
All Respondents and Likely Voter Table 14: Multiple Response Reasons for
Governor Candidate Choice |
||||||
|
“Why are you going to vote for this person?” (Interviewer
probes for answer, but does not read responses.) |
||||||
|
RESPONSE |
MOE FREQ. |
penny
FREQ. |
Pawlenty Freq. |
Pentel Freq. |
TOTALFREQ. |
PERCENT OF ALL RESPONSES |
|
Abortion
Position |
1 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
10 |
2% |
|
Budget Deficit Position |
2 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
8 |
1% |
|
Crime Position |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0% |
|
Don’t
Like Opponent |
3 |
13 |
2 |
0 |
18 |
3% |
|
Education
Position
|
25 |
7 |
4 |
0 |
36 |
6% |
|
Environment
Position |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
1% |
|
Good
Track Record- Exp. |
13 |
8 |
2 |
0 |
23 |
4% |
|
Gun/Hunting
Position |
0 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
4 |
1% |
|
Health
Care Position |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
4 |
1% |
|
Like
Candidate’s Character |
23 |
39 |
33 |
1 |
96 |
15% |
|
Like
Candidate as a Person |
19 |
38 |
26 |
1 |
84 |
13% |
|
No
Particular Reason |
7 |
9 |
1 |
2 |
19 |
3% |
|
Not
a Typical Candidate |
2 |
8 |
2 |
0 |
14 |
2% |
|
Position
on Terrorism |
4 |
4 |
7 |
4 |
15 |
2% |
|
Same
Political Ideology |
25 |
18 |
37 |
3 |
84 |
13% |
|
Same
Political Party |
31 |
14 |
38 |
0 |
86 |
14% |
|
Senior
Issue Position |
5 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
9 |
1% |
|
Social
Security Position |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
4 |
1% |
|
Somebody
Different |
2 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
14 |
2% |
|
Tax Position |
3 |
4 |
10 |
0 |
17 |
3% |
|
Time
for a Change |
3 |
11 |
3 |
2 |
19 |
3% |
|
Other |
10 |
15 |
14 |
1 |
42 |
7% |
|
Don’t
Know |
4 |
5 |
12 |
2 |
29 |
5% |
|
Total |
148 |
149 |
170 |
15 |
639 |
100% |
|
Table 15: 2002 Minnesota Senate Race |
||||||
|
“If the November 2002 election for U.S. Senate were being held today would you vote for Norm Coleman, the possible Republican candidate or Paul Wellstone, the Democrat or a candidate of another party?” (If
the respondent is not sure) “Although you are not sure, would you say you are leaning more toward Coleman, Wellstone or a candidate of another party?” |
||||||
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|||
|
|
2001 |
All
RESPONDENT |
LIKELY
VOTERS |
|||
|
RESPONSE |
FREQ. |
PERCENT |
FREQ. |
PERCENT |
FREQ. |
PERCENT |
|
Definitely
Coleman |
198 |
33 |
188 |
35 |
172 |
37 |
|
Leaning
Coleman |
55 |
9 |
45 |
8 |
32 |
7 |
|
Definitely
Wellstone |
222 |
37 |
163 |
30 |
146 |
32 |
|
Leaning
Wellstone |
38 |
6 |
||||