SPRING 2005 SCSU SURVEY OF SCSU STUDENTS

FREQUENCIES AND STUDENT DIRECTOR REPORTS

[Last revised 4/24/05 VERY EARLY ROUGH DRAFT

These are the UN-weighted overall frequencies. See methodology statement for more details. The sample demographics are a very close match to the known student population but were a bit high on seniors. Later we will probably weight the sample for class standing but this should have minimum effect on the results.

Use the valid %. Normally, the small amount who refused are excluded from survey analysis. Also watch skip patterns as small questions have fewer respondents as respondents may not have been asked the question. Sometimes, respondents who state don’t know, etc. may be excluded in other analyses.

777

QTRACK is scsu on right track

		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	right track	394	78.3	78.8	78.8
	wrong dir	54	10.7	10.8	89.6
	dk	52	10.3	10.4	100.0
	Total	500	99.4	100.0
Missing	ref miss oth	3	.6
Total		503	100.0

QPRIDE feel privde in scsu

		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	always	159	31.6	31.7	31.7
	usually	176	35.0	35.1	66.7
	sometimes	129	25.6	25.7	92.4
	not very often	26	5.2	5.2	97.6
	never	9	1.8	1.8	99.4
	dk	3	.6	.6	100.0
	Total	502	99.8	100.0
Missing	ref miss oth	1	.2
Total		503	100.0

QCHALL biggest challenge facing scsu

		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	acad rep	18	3.6	3.6	3.6
	advis	5	1.0	1.0	4.6
	apathy	7	1.4	1.4	6.0
	bud state supp	10	2.0	2.0	8.0
	buildings fac	2	.4	.4	8.4
	cost tuition	59	11.7	11.8	20.3
	civility friend	5	1.0	1.0	21.3
	course major offerings	14	2.8	2.8	24.1
	diversity race	61	12.1	12.2	36.3
	drinking drugs	21	4.2	4.2	40.6
	enrollment growth	6	1.2	1.2	41.8
	fac quality	8	1.6	1.6	43.4
	image pub rela	14	2.8	2.8	46.2
	jobs for grads	2	.4	.4	46.6
	keeping stud inform	3	.6	.6	47.2
	lib hrs holdings	2	.4	.4	47.6
	off campus hous	1	.2	.2	47.8
	parking	100	19.9	20.1	67.9
	sports rep	2	.4	.4	68.3
	st cloud comm	4	.8	.8	69.1
	stud quality	4	.8	.8	69.9
	scsu bud surp	3	.6	.6	70.5
	univ admin	6	1.2	1.2	71.7
	other	44	8.7	8.8	80.5
	dk	97	19.3	19.5	100.0
	Total	498	99.0	100.0
Missing	ref miss oth	5	1.0
Total		503	100.0

ASSIST past 2 year assist prof in res-schol

		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	none	330	65.6	65.6	65.6
	1-2	109	21.7	21.7	87.3
	3-4	33	6.6	6.6	93.8
	5-6	9	1.8	1.8	95.6
	more then 6	19	3.8	3.8	99.4
	dk	3	.6	.6	100.0
	Total	503	100.0	100.0

IMPORT how important prof research scholarly

		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	strong agree	166	33.0	33.1	33.1
	agree	275	54.7	54.8	87.8
	disagree	36	7.2	7.2	95.0
	strong dis	8	1.6	1.6	96.6
	dk	17	3.4	3.4	100.0
	Total	502	99.8	100.0
Missing	ref miss oth	1	.2
Total		503	100.0

COMP1 satisfied with student tech services

		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	very sat	125	24.9	24.9	24.9
	satis	316	62.8	62.8	87.7
	not sat	44	8.7	8.7	96.4
	not at all sat	5	1.0	1.0	97.4
	dk	13	2.6	2.6	100.0
	Total	503	100.0	100.0

comp2 how spend tech fee

		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	single user name	26	5.2	5.2	5.2
	n of workstations	233	46.3	46.4	51.6
	more tech user support	24	4.8	4.8	56.4
	increase printers	43	8.5	8.6	64.9
	more tech training	18	3.6	3.6	68.5
	n of labseats	31	6.2	6.2	74.7
	access to new tech	109	21.7	21.7	96.4
	dk	18	3.6	3.6	100.0
	Total	502	99.8	100.0
Missing	ref miss oth	1	.2
Total		503	100.0

comp3 access tech resources one year from now

		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	scsu dialup	69	13.7	13.7	13.7
	other dialup	50	9.9	10.0	23.7
	broadband access	332	66.0	66.1	89.8
	vol wont be at scsu next year	26	5.2	5.2	95.0
	dk	25	5.0	5.0	100.0
	Total	502	99.8	100.0
Missing	ref miss oth	1	.2
Total		503	100.0

comp4 which mobile device multiple response

		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	1. PDA	64	12.7	12.7	12.7
	2. laptop	240	47.7	47.7	60.4
	3. tablet	3	.6	.6	61.0
	4. smart phone	10	2.0	2.0	63.0
	5. other (______________________)	27	5.4	5.4	68.4
	6. NONE-VOLUNEERED	145	28.8	28.8	97.2
	7. DONT KNOW	13	2.6	2.6	99.8
	8. REFUSED	1	.2	.2	100.0
	Total	503	100.0	100.0

comp4

		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	1. PDA	4	.8	5.1	5.1
	2. laptop	40	8.0	50.6	55.7
	3. tablet	4	.8	5.1	60.8
	4. smart phone	17	3.4	21.5	82.3
	5. other (______________________)	11	2.2	13.9	96.2
	6. NONE-VOLUNEERED	3	.6	3.8	100.0
	Total	79	15.7	100.0
Missing	9. NO OTHER RESPONSE	424	84.3
Total		503	100.0

comp4

		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	1. PDA	1	.2	7.1	7.1
	3. tablet	5	1.0	35.7	42.9
	4. smart phone	4	.8	28.6	71.4
	5. other (______________________)	4	.8	28.6	100.0
	Total	14	2.8	100.0
Missing	9. NO OTHER RESPONSE	65	12.9
	System	424	84.3
	Total	489	97.2
Total		503	100.0

comp4

		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	4. smart phone	4	.8	80.0	80.0
	5. other (______________________)	1	.2	20.0	100.0
	Total	5	1.0	100.0
Missing	9. NO OTHER RESPONSE	9	1.8
	System	489	97.2
	Total	498	99.0
Total		503	100.0

comp4

		Frequency	Percent
Missing	9. NO OTHER RESPONSE	5	1.0
	System	498	99.0
	Total	503	100.0

comp4

		Frequency	Percent
Missing	System	503	100.0

comp4

		Frequency	Percent
Missing	System	503	100.0

comp4

		Frequency	Percent
Missing	System	503	100.0

comp4

		Frequency	Percent
Missing	System	503	100.0

comp4

		Frequency	Percent
Missing	System	503	100.0

comp5 view on print credit

		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	very high	41	8.2	8.2	8.2
	high	141	28.0	28.0	36.2
	low	140	27.8	27.8	64.0
	very low	55	10.9	10.9	75.0
	vol just right	117	23.3	23.3	98.2
	dk	9	1.8	1.8	100.0
	Total	503	100.0	100.0

MGM1 how many mgm taken

		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	one	48	9.5	9.5	9.5
	two	57	11.3	11.3	20.9
	three	151	30.0	30.0	50.9
	more then three	137	27.2	27.2	78.1
	none	67	13.3	13.3	91.5
	dk	43	8.5	8.5	100.0
	Total	503	100.0	100.0

MGM2 effect of mgm on tolerance

		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	more	205	40.8